reconciled among the stars

WTF?

Comments

WTF?

Comments

Profile

Latest Month

Tags

Page Summary

Feb. 12th, 2004 at 10:35 PM

So, on a list I'm on someone just posted a story with a warning that read, "...and rape (the non-con kind)."

Um... perhaps I'm getting conservative in my old age, but it seems to me that non-consensual sex is the definition of rape. Am I missing something?

( Leave a comment )

ruggerdavey.livejournal.com wrote:

Feb. 13th, 2004 06:46 am (UTC)

Dude, that the writer even said "rape (the non-con kind)" is offensive in the extreme. Rape is, by definition, non-consensual. This wasn't the CSI list, was it? Because I wouldn't be surprised if it was.

Link | Reply | Thread

carleton97.livejournal.com wrote:

Feb. 13th, 2004 02:33 pm (UTC)

Re:

no, I think it was the FATF list.

Link | Reply | Parent | Thread

ruggerdavey.livejournal.com wrote:

Feb. 13th, 2004 04:25 pm (UTC)

Re:

Ah. I'm on that one as well. I wonder why I didn't notice it.

Link | Reply | Parent

fyrelitefoot.livejournal.com wrote:

Feb. 13th, 2004 12:57 pm (UTC)

Some people get off on having sex that resembles rape ie where they fight like they're being raped or the intercourse is brutal.

To each their own....personally I think preferences like that give the wrong idea and are just horrible.

Link | Reply | Thread

carleton97.livejournal.com wrote:

Feb. 13th, 2004 02:35 pm (UTC)

Re:

You know, whatever. If you want to have brutal sex, fine, but if it's consensual, it's not rape. I just think that's fucked up. And people wonder why only a fraction of sexual assaults are reported.

Link | Reply | Parent | Thread

fyrelitefoot.livejournal.com wrote:

Feb. 13th, 2004 03:13 pm (UTC)

Re:

I know...it's horrible.

Link | Reply | Parent

( Leave a comment )

August 2012