WTF?

[carleton97]

So, on a list I'm on someone just posted a story with a warning that read, "...and rape (the non-con kind)."

Um... perhaps I'm getting conservative in my old age, but it seems to me that non-consensual sex is the definition of rape. Am I missing something?

Comments

[ruggerdavey.livejournal.com]

Dude, that the writer even said "rape (the non-con kind)" is offensive in the extreme. Rape is, by definition, non-consensual. This wasn't the CSI list, was it? Because I wouldn't be surprised if it was.

[fyrelitefoot.livejournal.com]

Some people get off on having sex that resembles rape ie where they fight like they're being raped or the intercourse is brutal.

To each their own....personally I think preferences like that give the wrong idea and are just horrible.

Re:

[carleton97.livejournal.com]

no, I think it was the FATF list.

Re:

[carleton97.livejournal.com]

You know, whatever. If you want to have brutal sex, fine, but if it's consensual, it's not rape. I just think that's fucked up. And people wonder why only a fraction of sexual assaults are reported.

Re:

[fyrelitefoot.livejournal.com]

I know...it's horrible.

Re:

[ruggerdavey.livejournal.com]

Ah. I'm on that one as well. I wonder why I didn't notice it.